Pfizers released documents that show that the vaccine was not recommended for pregnant mothers because of its risks to babies but the local media urged them to take it
Blog post by Marica Micallef
On the 6th of January 2021, Mark Pittman, a federal judge in Texas ordered the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to make public the 12,000 pages of data it relied on to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, imposing a dramatically accelerated schedule that should result in the release of all information” by the end of this summer. In his ruling, he ordered FDA to release 55,000 pages every 30 days until all 450,000 requested pages are public.
This order was ordained after a “group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA under FOIA to force release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine.”
In response to the FOIA request, the FDA had previously said that it takes approximately eight minutes per page to process records for a FOIA request, and that it could only review and release 500 pages a month, which is 6,000 pages a year.”
This means that at this rate, it would roughly take 75 years to release all the data”.
Following this loss in court which has forced the agency to expedite its process to make the information available to the public, last March the FDA turned over thousands of documents related to its review of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine which mark the first of several releases mandated by the court. Thus, so far, the agency has released 55,000 pages of COVID-19 vaccine review documents.
As part of this release, if we take section 4.6 “Fertility, pregnancy and lactation”, we find the following paragraph when it comes to “Pregnancy”:
“There are NO or LIMITED amount of data from the use of COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b2. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162B2 IS NOT RECOMMENDED DURING PREGNANCY.
FOR WOMEN OF CHILDBEARING AGE, PREGNANCY SHOULD BE EXCLUDED BEFORE VACCINATION. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised TO AVOID PREGNANCY FOR AT LEAST 2 MONTHS AFTER THEIR SECOND DOSE.”
When it comes to “Breastfeeding”, the paragraph reads: “It is UNKNOWN WHETHER COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used during breastfeeding.”
In the section “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Report”, Table 6 states that the “pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortions (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). NO OUTCOME WAS PROVIDED FOR 238 PREGNANCIES.
Bullet Point 6 states that of 124 cases, there were 49 non-serious and 75 serious, reported clinical events, which occurred in the vaccinated mothers. Pregnancy related events reported in these areas coded to the PTs were “Abortion spontaneous (25) uterine contraction during pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, abortion missed, and foetal death (1 each).
Bullet Point 7 shows that there were “4 serious foetus/baby cases reported to the PTs Exposure during pregnancy, Foetal growth restriction, maternal exposure during pregnancy, premature baby (2 each), and Neonatal death (1).
These documents are a huge smoke screen for big risks that these vaccines are creating to the newborn. The documents show that these big pharmacutical company knew about the serious adverse reaction that these vaccines can cause to pregnant mothers, which even include foetal and neonatal deaths, and that the vaccines can even cause the death of healthy babies through breast feeding.
It also shows that Pfizer vaccine was never properly tested on pregnant women but only lab rats. Thus, one should ask the Health Authorities if there was an increase in these last two years in the rate of foetal deaths and if yes, whether these deaths were registered amongst pregnant women who have taken the vaccine? One needs to remember that the local media, starting with the Times of Malta, urged pregnant mothers to take the Covid vaccines.