A few months ago, a Polish newspaper covered the quest a small group of individuals are making to introduce abortion in Malta. What came out is that the voting age in Malta was decreased to sixteen in an apparent attempt to facilitate the introduction of abortion in Malta. There was a consensus on this reform between the Government and the Nationalist Opposition. This aspect was kept hidden from the Maltese public by both the government and the media when this change in legislation was being discussed. Now, it appears to have been the primary motivation that promoted this change in legislation. This was revealed by Dr. Andrea Dibben, one of the activists in favour of the introduction of abortion in Malta. She spelled it out very clearly that 16-year-olds were given the right to vote to facilitate the introduction of abortion. She told the foreign journalist that Labour would be using abortion as a battle cry in the next general election to mobilize young people to come out to vote. The article was in Polish. Here is a translation by Google into English.
Moreover, in this article, there was also a reference to the Prudente story. This time around, the person interviewed is Lara Dimitrijevic. The reportage does not reassure the Maltese population of the good intentions behind this case. On the contrary, it continues to confirm the manipulation that has taken place, and that Prudente was brought over to Malta on purpose. Lara Dimitrijevic wraps it all under the term “in a way it was a combination of coincidences”. Consequently, international law is mentioned. It is argued that she was denied her human rights, so she is asking for compensation. Let us not forget that The Times covered Prudente’s story, and this site started unveiling the whole plot. Incidentally, a similar strategy was applied in Poland, with the same dynamics and arguments. This is what Lara Dimitrijevic told this Polish newspaper about this story.
Thus, if Lara Dimitrijevic thinks that Prudente’s case happens to be “a combination of coincidences,” why did she and her clients sue for libel this site for revealing and discussing these so-called “coincidences” around Prudente’s story?