The Government wants to socially ostracize those who do not take the jab

Blog post by Marica Micallef

In an article by[1] it was written that Dr Fearne “said that later on we can allow mass activities, where those who attend will be obliged to present a vaccine certificate.”  So, this confirms my blog entitled “Are the local Health Authorities hinting that those who fail to take the jab will be socially ostracised?” of 24th April, whereby I made reference to the situation in Israel where only the vaccinated can attend cafes, gyms, hotels, restaurants, cultural and other sports events. Israel is the country whose situation is being observed for guidance by the local Health Authorities, as Superintendent for Health, Charmaine Gauci is quoted to have said in local news portals.

So, I was right in my questioning that those who will refuse the jab will be ostracised. This is contrary to the article by the Times of Malta entitled “Malta introduces law for vaccine certificates”[2] which states that these certificates are different “from choices made by some other countries, such as Israel and Denmark, that are using their certificates to grant access to public places such as museums, theatres or sports events.” Wasn’t this statement misleading? Doesn’t this prove that my blogs are TRUE while the articles of the mainstream media are misleading? Doesn’t this confirm what Malcolm X had told us more than 50 years ago? – that “the media is the most powerful entity on earth” because “they control the minds of the masses” and if the masses aren’t careful, “the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing”.

So far, according to this article of TVM, Dr Fearne mentioned “only” mass activities.  Are there more prohibitions in the pipeline for the unvaccinated? Will they be prohibited to enter supermarkets and shops to buy food? Will they be banned from acquiring basic needs? Is this why a law for vaccine certificates was introduced in Malta? Is this the way forward for vaccine coercion? Is this an indirect way of telling the unvaccinated that they are breaking the law for refusing the vaccine and thus, the authorities have a right to punish them?  I would like to remind the government that Rule 1 of the Nuremberg code states that “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”  This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.

Is all this truly about upholding the law or abuse of power?

Will Malta lift restrictions for people who took the jab and exclude the rest? Will this mean that refusing the vaccine makes a person a second-class citizen, denied basic rights and access to normal services and society? While they are at it, can they exempt the unvaccinated from paying taxes?

The time has arrived for us to unite with courage while they divide with fear; let us unite with facts while they divide with politics; let us unite for humanity while they divide for power. Because while they divide for control, we unite for freedom.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *