Are mandatory vaccines lawful?

Blog post by Marica Micallef

We were forced to wear a mask, then we were forced to go into a lockdown and now it seems that we will be forced to take the vaccine. Strictly speaking, it has always NOT been about the first two – but about the enforcement of the last. Now, Indonesia’s capital Jakarta is threatening residents with fines of up to 5 million rupiahs (500e) for refusing COVID-19 vaccines, after having made jabs mandatory, while also stopping social aid. Indonesia is the world’s first in making the jabs compulsory. [1]

Italy is now the first in Europe to make jabs mandatory for health workers with Puglia giving fines of up to 5000 euros to health personnel who refuse it. This was approved by the Council of Ministers in a new Covid decree on the 31st of March. The decree also states that health workers who refuse the vaccine will be suspended from work and risk having their salary stopped!  Isn’t this intimidation?

This decree also protects health workers who carry out vaccinations from crimes of negligent personal injury and manslaughter. [2] This is an extension of the fact that even the pharmaceutical companies responsible for the production of the Covid-19 vaccine, are immune from any liability in case of any vaccine injury! Neither Pfizer nor Moderna can be sued in the U.S. Court of Law because the federal government has granted Big Pharma companies immunity from liability under the PREP Act which states that “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.”

The victims cannot also sue both the Food and Drug Administration for authorising a vaccine for emergency use and the employer for making the vaccine mandatory as part of the conditions of work. [3]

Because of these facts, I do not see a win for a French family who has recently filed a case over their 38 year old relative’s death, cause by a blood clot after taking the AstraZeneca jab. [4]

So, if vaccines are so “safe”, why can’t damages be sought in a court of law in case of harm? If the pharmaceutical companies are so confident in their product, then they would not have any issues in being trialled because they have proof that their product works!

Why are authorities using the art of persuasion to take it and resort to punishments if not? Doesn’t it show that there are people who are refusing the vaccine? Why cannot pharmaceutical companies be questioned in court? Isn’t a product that needs celebrity endorsement, government backing, laws against those who refuse it or tech giants banning info about it, a product that must be avoided at all cost?

Don’t people have a right to refuse? Mandated medical procedures of any kind are forms of medical coercion. Any restrictions on health choices violate basic human rights. Article 5 states that “An intervention in the health field can be carried out only after the interested party has given free and informed consent to it. This person must receive adequate information in advance about the purpose and nature of the intervention, as well as its consequences and risks. The interested party can FREELY REVOKE the consent at any time” while Article 7 adds that “No one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation”.

Disrespecting the free will of the people is also a violation of the Nuremberg Code 1947 because it becomes equivalent to a vast experiment completely done without informed consent!

The authorities’ argument – that this is done for the benefit of all the country and the world – is also a violation of Article 2 which states that “The interests and well-being of the human being will PREVAIL over the exclusive interest of society or science!

Yet, all our rights are being stripped away from us….





Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.